![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
deconstructing bug 210
Sep. 28th, 2011 12:55Relevant URLs:
Bug 210, Overhaul "memories". Comments in particular suggest at least one good significant modification to the original spec![[staff profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user_staff.png)
denise laid out.
( A lot of me thinking out loud about bookmarking on Dreamwidth, and questioning specific points on the existing spec. )
Edit: I also meant to toss out the idea of "access-only" bookmarking - letting you make a bookmark that only people to whom you give access on your droll [wow, that seems like really awkward wording] can see. Less private than private bookmarks; more convenient than "sending" a bookmark to multiple peoples' inboxes as the bookmarks themselves would show up directly in the "network feed" where you read all of your friends' bookmarks. I assume that sharing bookmarks with custom groups could be a natural extension of this, though maybe not part of the first-round draft?
Bug 210, Overhaul "memories". Comments in particular suggest at least one good significant modification to the original spec
denise laid out.( A lot of me thinking out loud about bookmarking on Dreamwidth, and questioning specific points on the existing spec. )Edit: I also meant to toss out the idea of "access-only" bookmarking - letting you make a bookmark that only people to whom you give access on your droll [wow, that seems like really awkward wording] can see. Less private than private bookmarks; more convenient than "sending" a bookmark to multiple peoples' inboxes as the bookmarks themselves would show up directly in the "network feed" where you read all of your friends' bookmarks. I assume that sharing bookmarks with custom groups could be a natural extension of this, though maybe not part of the first-round draft?
