ursamajor: Tajel on geeks (geeks: love them)
Bay Area friends! We've got another concert coming up with Oakland Symphony Chorus a week from Friday (February 16, 8 pm at the Paramount; The Artist As Activist), and we'd love to see you there. The Symphony will be performing Joan Tower's Fanfare for the Uncommon Woman, No 6 and Dmitri Shostakovich's Symphony No 5, and we'll be joining them for the world premiere of Carlos Simon's Here I Stand: Paul Robeson.

And then in April, OSC will be collaborating with Pacific Edge Voices for their The Sound Garden of Love concert at St. Mark's in SF. On the program: Elgar's Lux Aeterna, luminous and crystalline; it's new to me, but I'm looking forward to floating up there, supported by close harmonies. And to my utterly ecstatic joy, a piece with which I am quite familiar: Vienna Teng's The Hymn of Acxiom. Yes, when I found this out, my squeals could be heard clear across the bay. :D (I know! I still need to write about her Freight concerts in December, but suffice it to say for now that I am glad those shows have become part of my end of year rituals, grateful for every year she's managed to find a way to come back since my first time in 2019, or done an online concert the years she couldn't.)

There is something very now-ish about taking a song created with electronic voices based on one person's voice, and extracting it back out to a group of human voices to perform with all of our quirks and foibles, and the power of community enabling a group performance where we as individuals will need to take breaths unplanned, will make mistakes, but will make art, beauty, together. It feels zeitgeist-ish, similar to how I've written 100,000 words' worth of stories in the last six months, as if I'm rebelling against the mainstream embrace of large language models as authors, algorithms as intellects, corporations as people. Now-ish, even on the accelerated schedule of technology changes, because the forces Teng described in the early 2010s have had more than a decade to entrench themselves into our lives.

*

Sometimes, the advertising algorithms get stuck in a rut. Like Lily Diamond, I, too, have been inundated with lingerie ads in my social media in the runup to Valentine's Day, now barely a week hence, and I'm mildly curious if it's the usual spray and pray targeting feel of most ad campaigns, or if any signals I threw out being a person online have contributed to so intensely refocusing the ads that I'm being shown.

(someone is gathering every crumb you drop )

But what's being advertised even more avidly to me at the moment than even the seasonally predictable lacy red and pink and black trousseaux? These Friends of the Boundary Waters x Hippy Feet Merino Wool Hiking Socks.

they are cute ... )

look, I know I tend to evangelize about wool socks, but also 'now we possess you, you'll own that in time'? )

(o how glorious, glorious, a new need is born)

*

Later in that piece, Diamond confesses:

Aside from feeling bullied by an ostensibly omniscient algorithm that's supposed to know me and anticipate my needs better than I do myself, I feel a bit let down. It feels good to be known. I've made many a joke about my phone being a pseudo-surrogate boyfriend, but it's the algorithm we rely on to feel understood psychologically, spiritually, capitalistically.


(someone is learning the colors of all your moods, to (say just the right thing and) show that you're understood) )

(leave your life open, you don't have to hide)

And yet I'm posting this publicly, anyway - rolling the dice, seeing who will read, engage. (Hoping for who, rather than what. Betting that silence means what.) Going on four years of having our social life circumscribed by circumstance, our social media interactions bound by ever tighter limits.

Posting this here, while knowing that everyone is tired of creating Yet Another Account To Keep Track Of, and burned by the corporate mainstream options that are tolerated enough, if limited in other ways. And, too often, too worn down by the demands of twenty-first century life to conjure up the activation energy to engage, either. (Who has time for 2000 words of my rambling observations?) Yet I'll still link to this on the mainstream social networks where I know people, because. (I guess with Bluesky opening up this week, I ought to look again and see who's made digital homes there, on Threads, on Mastodon. I gave up last year because, again, Yet Another Account To Keep Track Of.)

*

I've also been reading Rebecca Solnit this weekend. Her latest for the London Review of Books, In the Shadow of Silicon Valley, weaves together a lot of loose threads. It's long, but worth the read. What caught my attention most was how she talked about the social pandemic both predating and coexisting with the current medical pandemic, a crisis of extractive technology impeding human connection, exacerbated since the first stay home orders. The loneliness Diamond expressed above, too.

(let our formulas find your soul) )

The piece ends with even Solnit sounding weary, she of changing the story from despair to possibility.

"I don’t know whether these billionaires know what a city is, but I do know that they have laid their hands on the city that’s been my home since 1980 and used their wealth to undermine its diversity and affordability, demonise its poor, turn its politicians into puppets and push its politics to the right. They have produced many kinds of dystopia without ever deviating from the line that they are bringing us all to a glorious utopia for which they deserve our admiration.

I used to be proud of being from the San Francisco Bay Area."


Valentine's Day will mark 4.5 years since [personal profile] hyounpark and I arrived (back) in the Bay Area. It is a markedly different Bay from the one I left for college; I am a markedly different person in my 40s now from who I was in my teens. But even with the 13-month interruption of staying home curtailing our plans to establish our Bay-based social life, see old friends more regularly, make new friends? The best parts of being here have been the relationships we're forging and reviving, the community we're finding our way into. And among our community, among the people we know, we're all trying to make things better for all of us.

We're all a chorus here, doing the work, needing to breathe at points when the sound must go on. Staggering our breathing as individual singers so we can sustain the sound as a whole. If you're feeling like Solnit here? Breathe. To end by quoting Vienna Teng again: "We've got you."
ursamajor: Tajel on geeks (geeks: love them)

I've been thinking about danah boyd's recent post on the current state of Twitter alternatives, along with the context of being a relative Internet Old.

my early internet participant context: .plans and fingering and retroactively understanding it as a social network )

What struck me most in boyd's analysis is the idea that the slow internal growth of networks was also one of the most significant stabilizing factors. It's paralleled my overall internet experience; many of my LJ friends simply never made the transition over to Dreamwidth, for example, despite whatever logical and emotional reasons to move were provided, illustrated in stories. At the time, we wrote off most of this to "network lock-in;" hanging out on the internet where the largest pure number of "my people" were as a way to optimize ROI on staying in touch with as many people as possible. Which illustrates how the majority of us ended up on Facebook, and slowly, the rich sharing we enjoyed on earlier networks atrophied, bowdlerized into pablum for audiences that now included people with even less of an understanding of the norms of the Internet and its communities that came before. >_>

And then of course, how you found your friends on social media in the 2010s was by uploading your contact lists. Trying to find my friends on 2023 social media like Bluesky and Mastodon has involved third parties that, to the average person, feel like their functionality and respect for data privacy is just as opaque as the more convenient if dangerous method of uploading a contact list.

Among my friends that remain active here on Dreamwidth, it seems like it's been primarily the geeks and the fen, both communities with at least a baseline commonality of norms not true of the broader Internet, long-accustomed to needing to move internet homes every so often, whether seeking novelty or security, and bringing their people along with, most of whom were used to coping with some level of inconvenience and inaccessibility.

But on a more personal level, it makes my recent archival project of centralizing and preserving my own broader internet archives on Dreamwidth feel like the ultimate "context collapse." For the me of 20 years ago, I posted on Planworld to keep in touch with primarily college friends, and I posted to LiveJournal to keep in touch with my online friends, most of whom at that time I'd met through X-Files fandom, or through volunteering for LiveJournal Support. Noting the differences in how I talked about my life; who knew what of me at the time. As the years passed, I built up my post-grad friends circles both in Boston and online, some of whom overlapped in fandom or geekdom, but many of whom didn't. But LiveJournal (and fandom) had gotten mainstream ~enough~, and my circles melded enough, that I grew into feeling comfortable writing for this blended audience, all of whom I counted as friends.

But for newer friends whom I might want to share older posts with, the context feels odd. Like, to give a recent example, trying to explain to the newer Planworld members currently in their early 20s that I was among the first of my college friends to date somebody I'd met on the Internet, even kind of? That almost nobody was on Match.com, that Tinder et al didn't exist? While at the same time, many of my online friends had been in relationships that started on the internet years prior to [livejournal.com profile] geebee_x dragging me and a law school friend of hers into an AIM chatroom one night in October 2001 to “secretly yet blatantly” set us up (🔒). But also, that most of the people with whom I was sharing these musings back then were people I had ongoing pre-existing relationships with, whether that was years in the same classrooms and clubs or years in the same chatrooms and mailing lists; that even in bringing new friends into the fold, my networks were mostly growing pretty slowly with specific contexts intact?

I feel a similar awkward butterfly-shedding-its-chrysalis around opening up here again, too - I've been away for so long, and I know I haven't kept up with many of you even elsewhere in recent years. But it still feels like part of how I want to be on the internet; be the change you want to see, be a person talking with other people in an otherwise transactional, influencer-capitalist society.

And I'm only up to summer 2003*! I wonder how I'm going to feel once I really start pulling in tweet threads and Facebook updates and Instagram pictures that stopped getting automatically backed up on Flickr and here.

  • Granted, summer 2003 and the people I met because of it were far more pivotal to my life than I could recognize at the time I was living it!
ursamajor: the Swedish Chef, juggling (bork bork bork!)
In the beginning, you could bookmark things to your web browser, and lo, it was okay. Because even in the early, heady days of the World Wide Web, there were enough websites out there that you couldn't be expected to remember them all.

And then there were search engines, so when your hierarchical bookmark folder system exploded out of sheer unwieldiness, you could just depend on a search engine to find what you were looking for, most of the time.

And then there was the vastly underappreciated Delicious, which let you bookmark things to the cloud, tagged for easy reference and rediscovery, and mostly shared in an awesome and unobtrusive way that meant you could often crowdsource information on a given subject in a way that you can't do with search engines, thanks to all of the metadata appended to Delicious bookmarks.

(And then Yahoo listed Delicious for sunset, AVOX AVOS bought it and eviscerated it, and everyone in my network fled to Pinboard or gave up on social bookmarking. It's still criminal what Yahoo had, and then trashed, in early December 2010. The Library of Congress archives tweets; this crowdsourced database directory of metadata-tagged encyclopedic knowledge deserved the same preservation. Yes, I am still saddened and furious, a year and a half on.)

And all the while, the popularity of various social media streams like Twitter and Facebook kept growing - more places to discover all sorts of useful information. But more often than not, these useful nuggets of information were buried in private or semi-private notes that were difficult if not impossible to bookmark (particularly with Facebook), let alone be able to search for after-the-fact. Neither of these tools come with particularly incisive or inclusive search functions.

Enter Greplin. (Referral link: right now, I have the free account, which lets you unlock a limited number of sources; if you join through me, I get to unlock more sources for free. :) )

Awhile back, in mid-February or so, I had the ambient awareness that we were in the heart of Maine shrimp season up here in New England; given that I follow a couple of hundred local restaurants on Twitter and Facebook, I would have been hard-pressed not to note that every Cambervillain chef and then some were dishing up wild Maine shrimp specials. So when I was at the grocery store and saw that they had wild Maine shrimp on special, you bet I picked up a pound of 'em and headed home to do my research.

Which meant that I typed "Maine shrimp" into Greplin and received the following results, personalized to my various reading lists:

Greplin


Most notably:
- East by Northeast had a Maine shrimp congee.
- The Blue Room fried up their Maine shrimp with jalapeno butter.

All this was crossing my mind at the same time I'd opened Google Reader (looks like the promise of HiveMined is dead, so GReader is the best alternative for now, even with no sharing) and spotted Jaden Hair's recipe for skirt steak with kimchi butter. Which inspired me to make wild Maine shrimp juk with kimchi butter:

Wild Maine shrimp juk with kimchi butter.


And it was damned good, even though the kimchi butter scared [personal profile] hyounpark at first. (He does not tend to trust me with kimchi anything ever since I brought him home a Lil' Kimchi, aka a grilled cheese, kimchi, and sweet sesame black bean sandwich. PROOF IT EXISTED.)

Moral of the story: GREPLIN IS MY NEW BACKUP BRAIN AND IT CAN BE YOURS, TOO.

*

Tangent. )
ursamajor: people on the beach watching the ocean (Default)
So [livejournal.com profile] shadesong linked this morning to a story about a blogger whose writing was republished in a print magazine without her permission.

When called on it, the editor of said magazine, Cooks Source, responded as follows:

"I have been doing this for 3 decades ... I do know about copyright laws ... the web is considered "public domain" and you should be happy we just didn't "lift" your whole article and put someone else's name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace."


rofl rofl rofl textbook case of how to not do web content or social media )

Profile

ursamajor: people on the beach watching the ocean (Default)
she of the remarkable biochemical capabilities!

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
678 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 19:46
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios